The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
people like mark and laird for instance um they find they can find comfort in that discomfort like laird is easily like watching him ride a 60 70 foot wave um was like very telling of where he's at fundamentally and how connected to nature he actually is he turns on in a way that it's like a calm happens and you can see it when you're right there with him and but there's preparation all around that with what they're doing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.