The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Uh, we have a simple test in the last book called the sit and rise test, which everyone has heard of now. Just lower yourself to the ground, criss-cross applesauce, right, without falling, and then without putting your knee down or hand down, pop back up. And so what's nice about that is that that's not even a full range of motion test. It's not even uh doesn't require that much strength, but it's a good indicator that you may be missing some hip flexion.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.