The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
how much intensity do I need if you can get that right week in and week out you will see continual improvements and that work will turn into result if you don't answer that correctly bad things happen you either waste your time because you're not getting as much out of as you could or you do end up overtrained in which case we see injuries and we see burnout and lots of things that are going to have negative Health consequences
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you go above it not the great things are going to happen if you go below it you're you're not going to get the output that you want and that amount is not easy to find and it changes on a weekly basis it's not the same week in week out and so the more that you can hone in on that core how much do I need and how much intensity do I need if you can get that right week in and week out you will see continual improvements and that work will turn into result if you don't answer that correctly bad things happen you either waste your time because you're not getting as much out of as you could or you do end up overtrained in which case we see injuries and we see burnout and lots of things that are going to have negative Health consequences