The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think there's a couple nba players just looking at some of the stories where they were using it not for rehab but just as an everyday kind of way to train where they were able to recover just a little bit faster and they don't have to have a as they've aged you know they want to make sure that they're ready to play on the actual court instead of just spending all their time recovering from their workout
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i know at ole miss for example as well as a lot of other division one schools in the athletic department i would say a large portion of them do have blood flow restriction devices so they are using it for rehab um and i know that i've seen you know players on espn in the nba nfl using blood flow station as well so i do think for rehab