The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we actually tried to get an IRB of an N of 1 again I'm Ryan Flaherty whoo I don't know if you know Ryan you know of him yeah so so Ryan and I and and a couple of other guys tried to get an N of 1 IRB at UCSD to do muscle biopsies on ourselves pre and post a certain type of nutrition exercise routine
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.