Peter Attia· MD
I don't um one of the things that we do look at though is if they are at risk for injury for tendons or joints because we do see that that changes but then once we treat them um I do not see a reason to change.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I don't um one of the things that we do look at though is if they are at risk for injury for tendons or joints because we do see that that changes but then once we treat them um I do not see a reason to change.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
One of the things that we do look at though is if they are at risk for injury for tendons or joints because we do see that that changes but then once we treat them um I do not see a reason to change.