Peter Attia· MD
I don't condense it down to a single metric I use only raw numbers all the time so I don't condense it down to a single metric I use only raw numbers all the time
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I don't condense it down to a single metric I use only raw numbers all the time so I don't condense it down to a single metric I use only raw numbers all the time
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I only work by raw numbers all the time so I don't condense it down to a single metric I use only raw numbers
No way we never use it. No, we only go by raw numbers. I only work by raw numbers all the time. So I don't condense it down to a single metric. I use only raw numbers.