offer protection even in higher-risk groups (like smokers or those who are obese)
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
offer protection even in higher-risk groups (like smokers or those who are obese)
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in the absence of smoking and obesity yeah exercise is really uh important for lowering the risk of cancer
we even see this with smokers so we can break them into sort of the smokers and the non-smokers with lung C cancer risk and even those who are smoking exercise will help them lower the risk of course that's small compared to the impact of not smoking but it shows that Exercise Works Within These groups to lower the risk