The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And let me introduce you to the work of Lar Hamilton [laughter] and Gabby Ree who are really the first people who for me put this into the language and context of performance that they be for whatever reason Leer got on to Wimhof and recognized that if he trained for these to be able to handle this very dynamic work on a breathold that he could get more work done, get held down longer, pop back up, recover faster, and he saw it as a competitive advantage.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.