The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
as a general rule you know let's say if you're 20 higher that's a time to start making sure you know what you're doing yeah or just you know and backing it off maybe that next week yeah i mean i i you know unless you have some compelling reason to think that you can handle that if you're if you're exceeding 20 then probably uh um yeah be cautious and ideally back off
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
as a general rule you know let's say if you're 20 higher that's a time to start making sure you know what you're doing yeah or just you know and backing it off maybe that next week yeah i mean i i you know unless you have some compelling reason to think that you can handle that if if you're if you're exceeding 20 then probably uh um yeah be cautious and ideally back off
let's say if you're 20% higher that's a time to start making sure you know what you're doing yeah or or just you and backing it off maybe that next week
oh my you know my this week I did 50% more than my 4-week average that's that's a bad bad sign