The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and historically the the the research studies with exercise have been done based on V2 Max that that that's been the the parameter to to to a prescribe exercise you know how many times we read x amount of subjects you know they were exercising for six months at 60% of you to Max or whatever right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and by the way when they say that do they mean the 60% of the heart rate that produced V2 Max or 60% of the power that was produc that that is their max power at V2 max they're they're yeah I mean there's so many different ways you can do this that I've always found it you have to get into the methodology very closely