The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
from age 13 to about 42 I was constantly involved in something very specific that I was training for so I never exercised I trained right I trained for boxing I trained for cycling I trained for swimming I had competitions I had meets and everything I did Visa exercise was in service of a goal
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
from age 13 to about 42 I was constantly involved in something very specific that I was training for so I never exercised I trained right I trained for boxing I trained for cycling I trained for swimming I had competitions I had meats and everything I did vis-a-vis exercise was in service of a goal and that made it very easy there was real specificity to what I did