The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
because it's just so good for your core and for your and you don't have the impact and you don't have the impact of running and all that and so it's just in the gist of so much development of your core and your legs and all that so keep that strong
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
because it's just so good for your core and for your and you don't have the impact and you don't have the impact of running and all that and so it's just in the gist of so much development of your core and your legs and all that so keep that strong