The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and the second tendon peels off over here and it goes outside the joint and attaches to a bony prominence in that weird scapula that you talked about which is such a weird looking bone um and it attaches there that never tears so but people often do tear the the other this biceps and it can be from wear and tear it can be acute traumatically
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.