The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you can measure degradation but the problem with degradation is how you're measuring it because it's we know that for example out of every amino acid that's used for protein synthesis seven out of eight of them are actually from degradation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you can measure kind of the net balance we do that with what's called an AV balance so you're looking at you take a labeled amino acid you're infusing it and you're looking you're sampling in the arterial of a muscle bed and then the Venus of the muscle bed and so basically depending on how much of that label shows up in the vein versus the artery we know how much is being retained in muscle so that we know what the net is you can Infuse a second label to presumably get synthesis as well and then you can figure out the difference of degradation but the problem with this is it requires a steady state you can't do it when you've trained or had a meal or anything like that it's pretty much exclusively fasted