if you gives people cushioning they actually land harder and that's been shown by a number of different research studies
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you gives people cushioning they actually land harder and that's been shown by a number of different research studies
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and when you put a support the muscles get weaker and there are lots of studies that show that when you take the support away take an arch support away the muscles of the foot get stronger when you add cushioning you land harder there have been a number of studies that have shown that that new hoka shoe causes people to hit harder
so if you're running in a cushioned a highly cushioned shoe most likely you're going to be landing on your heel which by the way i used to run in a hoka so i can relate i know what that feels like i know what it's like to heel strike in a hoka so when you heel strike in a hoka compared to heel striking in a conventional regular shoe normal shoe a nike air pegasus let's say you're likely to have based on research higher slopes it's called the load rate so a quicker application of force during that first impact peak