The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Uh, I would say, oo, that's a really good question. Um, you know, the sort of junk volume first if we can, right? um the [snorts] sophistication that comes along with the trappings of parents feeling like their kid is getting a leg up with like sports ladders. Um we see a lot of agility training kinds of things that feel sciency but aren't really sciency >> really.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.