Peter Attia· MD
i think even by the time i was in med school the teaching was really it's a type 1 and then a 2a and a 2b and then it became a 2a a 2ab a 2b you could argue it's even more complex now
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think even by the time i was in med school the teaching was really it's a type 1 and then a 2a and a 2b and then it became a 2a a 2ab a 2b you could argue it's even more complex now
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
um but as you said it's probably more complex than that and there's more of a Continuum I think even by the time I was in med school the teaching was really it's a type one and then a 2A and a 2B and then it became a 2A a 2ab a 2B You could argue it's even more complex now