Peter Attia· MD
the 2010 is generally favored because that's the one that was studied by ursawa and tabata
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the 2010 is generally favored because that's the one that was studied by ursawa and tabata
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
anybody who's tried both knows you can go so much harder for the 10 20 than the 2010.
tabatas are not named after the guy who developed the protocol he was the guy that wrote the paper ursawa developed the protocol they should be called ursawas