The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it doesn't appear to at least at the group level in in mostly healthy individuals so it doesn't increase the risk of blood clots and that has been looked at in some clinical populations as well which is good um it doesn't increase the risk of muscle damage you will get sore but when we look at the fiber it appears to be intact so it doesn't appear to be some structural damages at all
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but i would say that overall it does appear to be very safe you know that's something that we're we've been interested in for a long time i i do think that you know as you as with anything when you give a a drug in a large you know clinical trial you start to see you know some side effects that you've never seen before so my guess is is that it when it becomes more and more and more popular we will find there will be certain rare events that we've never seen before but i think in the actual studies that have been done we see it to be overall relatively safe
but i would say that overall it does appear to be very safe you know that's something that we're we've been interested in for a long time