The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
most of the stuff linking exercise to lower risk of recurrence has been observational studies epidemiological studies so these are always viewed with a a healthy amount of skepticism by oncologists and by health insurance companies and stuff as well well there's an association between exercise and these cancer outcomes and some of the uh randomized control trials that have been done have been very small studies 50 patients 60 patients
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so most of the stuff linking exercise to lower risk of recurrence has been observational studies epidemiological studies