Peter Attia· MD
the old group declined much faster than the younger group so both groups were able to see significant gains but the older you were the quicker you lost those gains with inactivity
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the old group declined much faster than the younger group so both groups were able to see significant gains but the older you were the quicker you lost those gains with inactivity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what we're talking about here is the malleability of the system what we're talking about here is how much could individuals improve in 6 weeks and the answer is they both improved dramatically
there was about a 133% Improvement in V2 Max a 34% Improvement in maximal workload so that's basically how many watts could you hit and then a 2.4 fold Improvement in endurance capacity