so the first step I would do if we really had this like 40 year time frame is I would invest heavily heavily in understanding proper movement patterns and then I would load them very specifically
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so the first step I would do if we really had this like 40 year time frame is I would invest heavily heavily in understanding proper movement patterns and then I would load them very specifically
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I have a very high training age... and yet as I'm now in my 50s I realize I need to be much more attentive to these principles of exercise variability and movement quality and the the reason is quite simply I'm much more prone to injury today than I was before
so the the first I would do if we really had this like 40 year time frame is I would invest heavily heavily in understanding proper movement patterns and then I would load them very specifically