The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the programming for us. very assembly lineish, very I always talk about the idea that uh it's a it's a recipe and not a menu. So, no one gets to pick what they want to do. You come in and it's like, "No, this is this is how the cake is made. It's in this order. This is what you get. Don't like it? Go someplace else where they're letting, you know, go to Planet Fitness. You can make your own cake. You want to come here, you do it the way we do it.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.