The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the best predictor of suffering what they called an adult style overuse injury was how specialized the athlete was and it wasn't necessarily their total time spent in physical activity it was if it was just the same thing over and over so there was like some protective effect from diversifying
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's been shown that those kids actually burn out quicker they get injured at a higher rate that it's important for kids to be using their bodies in a number of different ways that multi-sport athlete is much healthier than the single sport that doing
what we see is I think in the US we see a lot more injuries than in other places because of this always having a season and um from a standpoint of longevity definitely again make our kids do the same thing.