The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's it's basically an extremely broad term uh that try to Encompass more or less the exact same thing that we already talked about basically the let's say the the difference between where something is steady and where it goes over to unsteady or basically for where you can hold something for a longer duration and where it goes to um shorter duration
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
at the moment you start to talk about anerobic threshold this is more like okay are we talking about how do you define it is is 20 minute power is a 60 minute power what what kind of duration what kind of protocol and all these kind of things