The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in parallel to this you've got to be working on some of the stability stuff which is not necessarily weight based so this is where you're working on um intraabdominal pressure exercises really making sure that they can kind of pressurize the cylinder as we stay um breathing exercises so a lot of the stuff we borrow from DNS and PRI where we want to make sure that they can move their ribs correctly
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.