The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the other thing I would be doing is thinking about where the deficits are so let's say you have that person that's at 3 hours per week maybe their almi is already at the 70th percen on they're actually reasonably strong but their aerobic training is an atrocity so then I'm going to disproportionately add to that as opposed to just equally build all of them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the other thing I would be doing is thinking about where the deficits are so let's say you have that person that's at three hours per week maybe their almi is already at the 70th percentile and they're actually reasonably strong but their aerobic training is an atrocity so then I'm gonna disproportionately add to that as opposed to just equally build all of them