Peter Attia· MD
so the formula the math formula of 180 minus age and then adjusted based on all the factors is a way to basically gauge the intensity
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so the formula the math formula of 180 minus age and then adjusted based on all the factors is a way to basically gauge the intensity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Phil maone uses a test that I think is a pretty good starting place which is 180 minus your age Now the fitter you are the less relevant that becomes