The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the analogy i like to think about when i talk about feet is the tires on a race car... if you cram your foot into a narrow little box and remove it from the surface of the road it's sort of like making your tire have less grip more slip angle and less lateral stability none of those things are desirable in attire
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but the tires are the feet and you can have the greatest car in the world the most powerful engine the most remarkable chassis and the best driver if the tires are shot none of it matters you simply can't get the power to to the ground and back