The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the fact is it is anchored right up here at the superior labrum so when you tear that super labrum that biceps does funky things it becomes unstable and it and it gets more inflamed often and then that you get all that secondary pain
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so some people I'm not one of them some people who fix a lot of these will automatically just snip that biceps and and reattach it in the front so it's not no longer a pain generator