The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
go up to altitude shoot back down because what you see is you see a big dramatic increase in your hematic rate hemoglobin early on in those first three weeks and then it just starts to taper off right and so then you then you head back down to sea level and it's going to go back down but then you see when you come back up to altitude again another big dramatic shift so you just always want that shifting up right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we headed back to Stanford to train it sea level and so that was very much how we'd utilize altitude pre kids we have kids now so we can't do this but we had spend like two months up at altitude drop down to sea level for a month go back up drop back down and that was taken from Jack Daniels who's done a ton a ton of research in the running space I think probably one of the most Brilliant Minds in running in my opinion especially from a scientific uh perspective and I was asking him corresponding with him and like hey what's the best way to utilize alud and that's what he recommended he's like go up to altitude shoot back down because what you see is you see a big dramatic increase in your hematic rate hemoglobin early on in those first three weeks and then it just starts to taper off