The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there was a paper written on it suggesting that that's great but there are certain populations where they may hyper respond to that and you know i think that's a good point so i do think that it might be something to consider you know if you have um some sort of clinical element you might want to you know if you might be hypersensitive to to that reflex that might be something to really think about
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.