The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in the eye for example you have motor units as small as almost one to one which means there's a single motor unit coming in and activating a single muscle fiber that gives you extraordinary control of dexterity right and so you have a lot of nerves coming in to control a very small number of Fibbers that makes you have real high Precision with exactly where you're controlling
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.