The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
lactate generated from muscles is um is what it it's an extra Kine it's a mocine and it's a signaling molecule it gets into circulation and it is consumed by the brain it's consumed by the Heart by the liver also by the muscle it's it's consumed as a a very easily utilizable source of energy but also as a signaling molecule
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
lactate gets into circulation and it's taken up by other tissues including the muscle the brain the heart liver and it's used as energy in those tissues so it's a very energetically favorable source of energy it's actually easier to make energy from lactate than from glucose
And so what happens is it is communicating with the brain and the heart and the liver and all these other organs where the lactate is going into and it's activating a variety of stress response pathways so that you can deal with stress.