The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they optimized a lot of different things you know they're trying to optimize the nutrition the enraged nutrition the aerodynamics they're like doing things like sticking bump adhesive bumps onto the legs of the runners to to try and reduce the air dyna the the drag when they're swinging their legs back and forth
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
their mission was basically they'd spent about two or three years 20 people full time working on it trying to i i don't know how to say it to engineer a sub two-hour marathon