The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and I usually go straight to the methods section — and that gets into the details so okay you know this if this was an exercise study — and they did muscle biopsies I just want to really get right down to it so how many subjects were there how were they randomized what were the interventions when were the biopsies taken was there a crossover you know I just want to get into all that detail
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.