The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if we're speaking to a general population I would say that no sling or sling decision was based on what we knew exactly what we did. The other thing is that you followed everything to a tea. One of the big complications in rehab, athlete or not, is are people following the rules.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what you're looking for in that situation, especially with the shoulder, because it's such a mobile joint, is you want to make all the muscles around the shoulder just awesome. But we need to do so in a way that doesn't make the surgery, you know, more complicated or injure you more, right?