The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think this has to do with with a lot with with tradition and also that even when power meters were introduced it's easy to look back and say like why why why didn't we have this before or even how power there's so much information we can extract from a single power meter today which is I say Beyond people's uh comprehension still we only use the power number that is there and we use it even in a onedimensional context FTP for example or critical power
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think this has to do with a lot with with tradition and also that even when power meters were introduced it's easy to look back and say like why why why didn't we have this before or even how power there's so much information we can extract from a single power meter today which is I say beyond people's uh comprehension still we only use the power number that is there and we use it even in a one-dimensional context FTP for example or critical power uh the amount of information you can get out of this is crazy