We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I just saw somebody Twitter the other day somebody said that you know scouting starts now at 10U. This was a woman who runs uh a softball development program. And I just I literally I typed it. I said, "No, that's that's absolutely bad information."
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I just saw somebody Twitter the other day somebody said that you know scouting starts now at 10U this was a woman who runs uh a softball development program and I just I literally I typed it I said no that's that's absolutely bad information it's they start using words like development and exposure.