Paul Saladino· MD
they definitely squat by necessity and sometimes they would have a log on the ground that was eight to ten inches high but they would essentially be deep squatting onto a log or they would be cross-legged
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they definitely squat by necessity and sometimes they would have a log on the ground that was eight to ten inches high but they would essentially be deep squatting onto a log or they would be cross-legged
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what you and i are doing right now we're sitting it's very unnatural what we evolved to do was to squat