The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but uh you run that system long and hard enough and it starts to get out of whack to where you try to get another impulse going and it's like uh so it needs to do a lot of pumping to take what is supposed to be inside the cell that's now outside the cell to get back in there to a level of concentration that would you would be fully recovered
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you run that system long and hard enough and it starts to get out of whack to where you try to get another impulse going and it's like uh so it needs to do a lot of pumping to take what supposed to be inside the cell that's now outside the cell to get back in there to a level of concentration that would you would be fully recovered now typically that happens quickly but if you run that system a lot there are various points at which some of the structures that are supposed to do that they're also proteins you use them enough and they start to kind of break a little bit and you need to produce more proteins to replace the channels themselves that do that pumping back and forth