The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the point i want to make that is a very important one that you just uh made is that this uh this idea of cuff size matters right because the pressure and the force are related by the area that that that uh that cuff uh takes up so is it safe to say that the wider the cuff the lower um pressure you need to reach occlusion yes that's definitely true
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.