The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's very common for example to for um it's not common but it's certainly known that you can have something like hip arthritis or a labal tear and because of the neuroanatomy of the joints you only have knee pain and no hip pain at all
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we think it's because the opter nerve has an articular branch in the hip and an articular branch in the knee and so sometimes it's just you don't know where it's coming from it's just your interpretation of the irritation