The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so the american lifters would consider a rep one is up and down so that was they were putting all their effort into the concentric but then you know more or less dropping the weight on the way down not really focusing on the effort to put the weight down and the eastern european lifters were doing the opposite right they were counting it as two reps a r it's up one down two so it was just as much effort into that e-centric
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.