The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think in in whether you're on a bike or running or whatever you you need to as a coach as a clinician and in that kind of race i served as a clinician because i did things like biofeedback neuromuscular biofeedback obviously there's significant stress in that area of the body you still want to allow the athlete to voice you know how they would like to do this race and then you want to voice how you think it should be done you come to some meeting of the minds
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
for me it was always i'm not willing to sacrifice the health of this athlete because that's that's against what i do as a clinician as a coach i want him to perform his best