Peter Attia· MD
the heart also is a muscle and it's Al it's not very efficient muscle so even the heart has an energy has has a it's not an insignificant it's actually a significant energy uh consumption as well
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the heart also is a muscle and it's Al it's not very efficient muscle so even the heart has an energy has has a it's not an insignificant it's actually a significant energy uh consumption as well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I looked more at the I say when we broke down the body into into components is more like where I looked at basically the energy consumption the mitochondrial density of cardiac muscle versus skeletal muscle