The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
but any any amount is beneficial so it's not like you know oh well I can't do 300 minutes therefore I shouldn't even care well that's not true because there is there are benefits you know even with like any type of physical activity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and what you see with the exercise guidelines nowadays if they've almost backed off any um recommendations in terms of the frequency duration component doesn't really matter how you slice and dice that exercise so this guideline of 150 minutes per week we used to say 5 days per week for 30 minutes and then we used to say okay well spread it out over at least 3 days and in minimum durations of 10 minutes and now they're not even saying to spread it out over multiple days and they're not even saying it needs to be a minimum of 10 minutes at once so the whole weekend warrior thing Pro well you can probably go on a Saturday and Sunday and do 50 minutes you know if you're out doing a a hiking or or some other activity and that might be just as beneficial as spreading it out over different days