if you're trading properly you are asking a lot of your physiology you are pushing it to its limits if you're not you're not using your time best and you're not getting the best outcomes
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you're trading properly you are asking a lot of your physiology you are pushing it to its limits if you're not you're not using your time best and you're not getting the best outcomes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you're not you're not using your time best and you're not getting the best outcomes because a lot of the absolute best results come from pushing very very hard not necessarily to limits but you have to test the limits right