The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the results speak for themselves and those patients do have the correct patterns of movement they are able to get air fully into their lungs they're able to get their diaphragm low into their abdomen they're able to flatten out their pelvic floor generate concentric robust intra-abdominal pressure that stabilizes every aspect of them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
those patients do have the correct patterns of movement they are able to get air fully into their lungs they're able to get their diaphragm low into their abdomen they're able to flatten out their pelvic floor generate concentric robust intra-abdominal pressure that stabilizes every aspect of them